Petro’s Colombia: A Case Study in How Not to Run a Country

A.PAES / shutterstock.com
A.PAES / shutterstock.com

Ladies and gentlemen, gather ’round as we delve into the latest episode of ‘What Could Possibly Go Wrong?’ featuring none other than Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro. You might remember him as the former guerrilla turned politician who promised ‘Total Peace’ for his nation. Well, spoiler alert: things aren’t going exactly as planned.

Let’s start with Petro’s ambitious ‘Total Peace’ strategy. The idea was simple: negotiate with all armed groups simultaneously and bring an end to decades of conflict. Sounds noble, right? But here’s the kicker: instead of peace, Colombia is witnessing a surge in violence, especially in regions like Catatumbo. The National Liberation Army (ELN) and dissident factions of the FARC are at each other’s throats, leading to over 80 deaths and displacing tens of thousands. So much for peace talks.

In response to this chaos, Petro, the man who once preached reconciliation, has declared a state of emergency in Catatumbo. He’s granted himself emergency powers to impose curfews and restrict movement in a bid to restore order. It’s almost as if negotiating with terrorists doesn’t lead to peace. Who knew?

But wait, there’s more. On the international front, Petro recently found himself in a spat with President Donald Trump. After refusing to accept deportation flights of Colombian nationals from the U.S., citing concerns over their ‘dignity,’ Petro faced the full force of Trump’s tariff threats. Unsurprisingly, Petro quickly reversed his stance, even offering Colombia’s presidential plane for future deportations. It’s a classic case of tough talk meeting harsh reality.

Back home, Petro’s approval ratings are plummeting faster than a lead balloon. His grand promises have collided with the hard truths of governance. The ‘Total Peace’ plan is in tatters, the economy is under strain, and public confidence is waning. It’s almost as if electing a former guerrilla with socialist leanings wasn’t the best idea. Who could have predicted this outcome?

In conclusion, Gustavo Petro’s tenure is shaping up to be a textbook example of how not to lead a nation. His policies, though well-intentioned, are proving disastrous in practice. Colombia deserves better. The world is watching, and the lessons are clear: ideology without pragmatism leads to failure. Let’s hope future leaders take note.